« back
to News section
The market experienced a bad case of new
high anxiety as investors looked for reasons to think the
bull market's run is finally over. For the week, both the
S&P 500 and NASDAQ declined -0.7% while the Dow fell -0.6%.
Some observers are pointing to increased
tension between the U.S. and Iran for last week's market sell off. From
my perspective, it's a case of an overbought condition
and the fact that the NASDAQ Comp and NASDAQ 100 have still
not confirmed the recent highs in the S&P 500 and DJIA.
The bulls and the bears can't put their
arms around a catalyst that can trigger a market correction.
Sometimes you
don't get a catalyst before market corrections...sometimes
buyers get satiated and support levels just give way.
In March
of 2000,
the
market
mania
peaked
just after PALM came to market. In hindsight, that was a
seminal event that marked the end of the bull market. Seven
years
later, hedge funds have been a major factor in the marketplace
with a major hedge fund going public last week. Wouldn't it
be ironic if it turns out to be another
seminal event?
Regardless, you have to admire today's
investors, they just (at least so far) refuse to say "good
bye" to their
stocks. And this is in the face of a variety
of negatives such as the "hard landing" scare
in housing, the war in Iraq, the massive US deficits,
Iran continuing on its nuclear path, rising oil prices --
well you name it, investors just don't care about risk they
are just focused on returns. What is worrisome is that at
the same time individual investors are holding on for every
last gain the market has it offer, corporate insiders are
selling at a furious pace. As noted last week by Investors
Intelligence: "It would have been very favorable
if the insiders did not increase their sales with the latest
up move, as that would
have shown that they had wished to hold onto their shares
for more gains. But that was not to be and the latest data
had their sell decisions exceeding their purchases by a
factor of eight to one."
One has to wonder why there has been such
large increase in insider sales when the prospects for economy
and the
markets
are supposed to be so great. This is one of many reasons to
remain cautious and remain risk averse in managing client
portfolios.
Next week may be a bit more
exciting. On Valentine's
Day, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke will update Congress about
the economy and Federal Reserve policy. Also, we'll
see economic data released on retail sales and housing starts.
| Returns through 02/09/07 |
1-Week |
Y-T-D |
1-Year |
3-Year |
5-Year |
10-Year |
| Dow Jones Industrials |
-0.6 |
0.9 |
15.2 |
5.9 |
4.9 |
6.3 |
| Nasdaq Composite |
-0.7 |
1.8 |
8.7 |
6.1 |
5.9 |
6.3 |
| Standard & Poor's
500 |
-0.7 |
1.4 |
13.5 |
8.1 |
5.3 |
6.2 |
Source: Yahoo! Finance, Barrons
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Indices
are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.
Three-,
5-, and 10-year returns are annualized. Assumes dividends are
not reinvested.
IF YOU TAKE MONEY OUT OF YOUR RETIREMENT
PLAN BEFORE you reach age 59 ½, you may owe ordinary
income taxes and a 10% IRS penalty for early withdrawal. There
are exceptions to this rule, though. They include death, disability,
and taking a series of substantially equal, periodic payments.
Under Section 72(t) of the tax code, a
person can take a series of substantially equal, periodic
payments from some types
of retirement plans, as long as the payments: continue for
at least 5 years or until age 59½, whichever is longer;
are distributed at least annually; are based on a single
or joint life expectancy (but once the choice is made, the
election
cannot be changed during the time period selected); are
not made until you after you stop working for the company.
The
dollar amount of substantially equal, periodic payments
can be calculated in one of three ways using:
- The Required Minimum Distribution method (RMD),
which generally produces the relatively low, variable payments.
- The
Annuitization method, which usually produces the highest
72(t) payments.
- The Amortization method, which may
produce a payment that is smaller than the annuitization
method and larger
than the RMD method.
All three methods can be based on a single
life expectancy or the joint life expectancy of the retiring
person and
his or her beneficiary. Once a method has been chosen
and 72(t)
payments have been calculated, the calculations generally
cannot be modified.
Many
companies have rules about office romance, but that hasn't
stopped people from finding love at the office. According
to Vault Inc.'s 2006 Office Romance Survey, almost
30% of employees have had a tryst in the office. That's
an increase of almost 5% over 2005. Although more people
are willing to admit in a survey that they've engaged
in office romance, fewer are being open about it in the office.
The number of couples who have successfully kept their office
romances secret is up, while the number of couples being
open about their relationships has fallen from 19% during
2005 to 12% during 2006. What is the most common rule that
companies have about office relationships? Employees are
not allowed to date a direct subordinate or a superior.
Which well-known English poet and author was responsible
for tying the knot between St. Valentine's Day and romance during
the 14th century?
Click here to view the answer.
Best Regards,

P.S. Please feel free to forward this newsletter
to family, friends, or colleagues.
|